Finally, the recognition we deserve!

Here in #jesus_sucks_dick, we're always trying to get on the evening news because it's the only way we can .. ok, I dunno wtf this bitch is talking about. Under the 'disturbing' section of Lisa Hartz's "Does the internet change religion?" page, it says this about us:

Sites under this category can be considered the most dangerous, because the content is illogical and without any supplementary evidence. For example, the url alone for the site www.jesus-sucks-dick.com implies that this site's content is in no way ingenious or profound. Among the site's features are a survey asking "How much would you pay to see Jesus f****ed by gay blacks?" and "Top 10 uses for the Bible: a coaster, lining for a birdcage, etc." At best, this website can be seen as the work of 4th grade dropouts looking to make the evening news.

I find it interesting that the same criteria that she uses to find us 'disturbing' applies to the religion she's apparently defending. Belief in god/jesus/jehovah/etc is illogical and without any supplementary evidence.

She even gives us a plug (thanks). But what I'm wondering is why she bothered censoring the word 'fucked,' but not the word 'dick.' And 'gay blacks' doesn't sound like us. We'd say something more along the lines of 'fagnigger.' Is that a word?

Also, that 'Top 10' list was actually a poll, and our viewing public (you) submitted most of those answers. So, you should mail her and tell her you want the recognition.

If only we actually had changed religion. But it seems to keep right on being fucking crazy.

Comments

Nah...

The lesbian nazi hookers thing was from Weird Al Yankovic's "UHF". Fantastic movie. Really.

How the spadger did we miss

How the spadger did we miss this for 6 years? I seem to remember a topic years back about "lesbian nazi hookers want to adopt black transvestite babies" but I'm pretty sure that was a Jerry Springer referrence.